What does it mean for a school to self-organise?

I was taken back to this initial idea, can schools self-organise?, after reading an article by Weston & Blain (2010) called "The end of techno-critique: the naked truth about 1:1 laptop initiatives and educational change". The reading of the article is of course related to my current work where we are running a large-scale 1:1 initiative in 6 European countries. At the end of the article, which I absolutely recommend reading, the authors conclude:

...1:1 initiatives can be fertile ground for the creation of new-paradigm schools, the schools that are self-organizing. The widespread availability of laptop computers can be a driver for the more expansive efforts that must happen in order for schools to meet the educational needs of all students....While the original mission of 1:1 laptop computer initiatives did not include shifting of educational paradigm, turning those initiatives toward the creation of self-organizing schools may be the the way forward for techno advocates and critics alike.

It's a lot about "change" in general, and especially the change that has to take place at the whole school level, not only by individual teachers, which still seem to be a trend when looking at the ICT implementations.

In our eTwinning, for example, we have more than 90 000 teachers signed up in Europe, which can be considered a good success (about 1.85% of all European teachers!). The naked truth comes out, though, when you look at the penetration by schools: about 75% of the schools have only one single teachers signed up in eTwinning, whose mission statement is "The community for schools in Europe". The community of schools build by single teachers who do not collaborate within their own schools?

So back to self-organisation - what would it mean for a school to self-organise? The hypothesis that I used for my PhD to study self-organisation within learning resource repositories was this:

The main hypothesis is that the self-organisation aspect of a social tagging system on a learning resource portal helps users discover learning resources more efficiently. Moreover, user-generated tags make the system, which operates in a multilingual context, more robust and flexible.

In this case, we could hypothesise:

The self-organisation aspect of a school helps learners learn more efficiently. Moreover, it makes the school more robust and flexible.

Bonabeau & Meyer (2001) use the following terms when talking about social insects and how they self-organise:

• Self-organisation (activities are neither centrally controlled nor locally supervised);
• Flexibility (the colony can adapt to a changing environment);
• Robustness (even when one or more individuals fail, the group can still perform its tasks).

Adapted to a school, these would be interpreted as:

• Self-organisation (activities are neither centrally controlled nor locally supervised);
• Flexibility (the school can adapt to a changing environment);
• Robustness (even when one or more individuals fail, the school can still perform its tasks).

Wow, that would be powerful, or what!?? Could 1:1 really ever help schools to self-organise? I guess this is one more reason to keep working hard on our 1:1 pilot. The next questions would be; how can a school self-organise? and what is required for a school to self-organise?

When I first started to think of this question, I was attending The Big Ideas Fest in California organised by ISKME. I was thinking of what would be A REALLY big idea for education. I think this is a pretty darn big one...